Musical Pieces  



This piece of music by Frédéric Chopin (1810-1849) is from 1837.



Youtube comments ...

mysteryp1998: @azppiano jesus christ - this isn't the doctor phill show. just enjoy this artists music and stop talking about your feelings.

LangaArchitects: Perfect.

avandesande: There interpretations by Cubus take advantage of the sustain, reverb and decay characteristics of a synthesizer. Since there is more 'fill' between the notes he doesn't need to go as quickly. Weather or not this is your cup of tea I am glad that someone is experimenting with electronic music this way.

plogthesmith: Just about everything I hear from you is lifeless and plodding because you play too slowly. I don't get it. You obviously play well. Hard to fathom.

justapersonlikeyou: I LOVE THIS SPEED. i'm playing this, and haven't actually heard any other versions. but still- it's incredibly expressive!!

mrbratsch: they're suppose to be eh? yeah did god say so? lol

azppiano: @newFranzFerencLiszt Well, I kinda agree with you- now the music sounds stagnant and "unflowing" but this is ONE interpretation- listen to something else if you don't like this. @DragonerPhoenix This franzferencliszt person plays piano as well. Some his videos say "Me playing _____." Understand other people's position and respect their opinions, instead of calling them "a**hole" and other words along those lines. There is no right or wrong- only opinions. (in this case, at least)

Hauntershadow: Bravo. I echo the sentiments of previous comments in remarking upon this slower (and rather expressive) interpretation of this piece.

DragonerPhoenix: hey, asshole, this is his interpretation of it. It sounds beautiful. I doubt you could do the same. So shut up.

alicelenore: Lovely. I agree with your interpretation. I've never heard it played like this before. Very expressive. Well done.

newFranzFerencLiszt: do you want to play this slower? you can reach 10 minutes if you want

Eric1029res: ? what are you saying?

wongy2006: well... the tempo marking does say andante... but I'm happy enough to hear it played slowly as, after all, it IS a nocturne.

Eric1029res: Ich liebe vereidigung in deutschen!!!

Noahedwinbeach2: Everyone has their own interpretation. There is beauty in everyones own style. I enjoy slower pieces because it allows me to fully take in all the notes. Nocturnes are supposed to be played in slower more melodic style. Besides at night time you play slower pieces. This is music people can relax to. I mean if I am drinking wine and spending time with my wife I don't want to be listening to Etudes. Think about it.

llllloolllll: zzzzzzzzzzz goodsound but come on chopin dont will broken

ollie1400: Sounds very nice, but quite a bit too slow in my opinion. Also, did you add echo to this recording?

nrod81: yes please more Chopin pieces!!!

DepthSolitude: Nice, really nice, sounds so good, I liked the sound, so realistic and smooth at the same tim. Did you use a reverb?, cause sounded so good and the technique that you have is wonderful fortes and pianos so clearly, I'm studyind this piece and I love it, thanks 4 sharing and keep it doing ! :D

TOMASDELPICO: uuuuuuuuh que flash esa reverb!!!!!!!!!!!!

qwertyz15: i think i'm going to learn this, I like being able to put feeling to my playing and i like this style and song ;)

qqwink: what kind of piano do you have? it sounds wonderful

spiridusha14: it must to be played slow ;)

spiridusha14: i have to play this on my exam and i love it:xX

Frédéric Chopin: Op. 32, No. 1.
  • MP3
  • Score
  • Go to index

    Video views: 43853


    Custom Search

  • Copyright © 2007-2012 Cubus | cubus@sol.dk | Home