This piece of music by Frédéric Chopin (1810-1849) is from 1829.
Youtube comments ...
johnnykaylon: such a wonderful interpetation :D why do you not
play the classical piano but you play the
electronic one ?
throwscats: @deadly990 @deadly990 Haha, nah. I'm in the
same boat as you, really. I started listening
to classical music about fourish years ago, now,
and I was pretty much the same, so I get it.
I would only listen to one pathetique sonata
because I had a sort of music tunnel vision, for
example. Now I've listened to like a billion
interpretations of that one.
I still have favorites, though--Moravec for the
nocturnes, for example, but Montero plays a mean
d-flat nocturne, so that's an exception.
throwscats: Haha, nah. I'm in the same boat as you, really.
I started listening to classical music about
fourish years ago, now, and I was pretty much
the same, so I get it. I would only listen to
one pathetique sonata because I had a sort of
music tunnel vision, for example. Now I've
listened to like a billion interpretations of
that one.
I still have favorites, though--Moravec for
the nocturnes, for example, but Montero plays
a mean d-flat nocturne, so that's an exception.
throwscats: Haha, nah. I'm in the same boat as you, really.
I started listening to classical music about
fourish years ago, now, and I was pretty much
the same, so I get it. I would only listen
to one pathetique sonata because I had a sort of
music tunnel vision, for example. Now I've
listened to like a billion interpretations of
that one.
I still have favorites, though--Moravec for the
nocturnes, for example, but Montero plays a mean
d-flat nocturne, so that's an exception.
deadly990: ..... wow 2 years ago.. i didn't even know that
i liked classical music 2 years ago. anyway i've
become more open to interpretations since
then.... and i sound like a retarded 14 year old
(which i was) in that comment.
throwscats: Lol, that's not true, Rubenstein plays this
faster and it sounds absolutely wonderful.
Listen to it :P It's beautiful.
throwscats: Good question. Probably my favorite waltz by
him, though. Very soothing.
Sebaspelaez1: This is just AMAZING, it almost made me cry!
:)
hellothereimasian: loved your interpretation of this waltz. i'm
just curious, but might you have any pieces
of liszt, completed?
TheSingingCello: he was actually incredibly ill
plemmplemm3: 2 people dunno what is music...
MCMAK9: This is the most classical five star Hotel
song I've found.
nicmetalhead: Idem à l'Op. 70 No.2, bravo
DarknessL12: I don't get it ...It absolutely one of the
best valses from Chopin ..Why it's not famous ?
Wasabi8899: kinda the first time I'm hearing that beautiful
waltz played at that speed....but I'm strangely
like it. It makes the melody more romantic.
Very nice performance!
daytonmlivingston: I call this Chopin waltz: "The Waltz of the
Drunken Parisians" He sounds as if he were drunk
while writing it! But its still one of my
favorite Chopin's.
MIXOLYDIAN123: Tough. He's dead so we can do whatever we
like with his work. Just like some people hate
it when capital letters are missed off the
beginning of sentences but you chose to do so.
That's your choice.
kaman1002: you make me want to do better.
great job!
Streabrijante: It's a blessing to hear you play
rlbigfish: I do agree that he played it kind of slow; it
feels almost like a nocturne this way. Not
that that's a bad thing, but this one is
supposed to be a bit faster, for sure.
Beautiful playing nonetheless.
kokoramoni: like u didnt understand...
alexkonow: Not at all. Listen to Ashkenazy.
deadly990: any1 who plays it faster does not know how to
interpret music.
Cindermakers: Who's Fryderyk Chopina?
kaleidoxkopio: Deliciously delicate.Thanks a million.
Musical Pieces 
